Cipher Chain

[ElectroUnderwear]

EDIT: Don't mind me, I'm blind

 

[rickyboy320]

"There's" is technically one syllable, but I'm guessing that one is picky enough to let slide

Switch - 1
Two - 2
Vow - 3
Els - 4
If - 5
There's - 6
One - 7

I don't see the problem (?)

 

[Zombie]

isxth~urle~iwll~eb~ufn
lal~vewols~umst~eb~nemburs
A~si~4~nad~tec.

(im saying that etc is 1 syllablye cuz i want to. JUST SAY ETC not the full wrod lol)

 

[SleeknFoxy]

Idk what the number for u would be.
Also you did not do the tilde in between the words of each line, which breaks the way it was done before. Not sure if this is a rule break or not.

 

[rickyboy320]

Even so,
urle should've been relu

 

[Alphaesia]

Rule 1: You may not reference any sort of poetry but you must include two rhyming words.

 

[Bobtheblob]

Rule 2: You must write out your sentence backwards, try to not make them a bore.

 

[SleeknFoxy]

.ti no elcatceps a ward dna ,tah a ni tac a fo erutcip a hcattA :3 eluR

EDIT: Spectacle, monocle, same thing.

 

[Pieceofcheese87]

?taht fo kniht uoy od tahW ."TAC" drow eht htiw "t" dna ,"a" ,"c" srettel eht fo secnatsni lla ecalpeR :4 eluR

 

[Zombie]

?xim TAC TACTAChTAC TAC'niTAC ,"6" hTACiw seTACTACps llTAC eTACTAClpeR :5 eluR

 

[MOUTHWEST]

Incorrect. After decoding rule 4, you'll note it says to replace the letters with "CAT". When applying the rules in order for the next text, you'll see that you reverse the sentence first, then replace the letters with "CAT" - so each CAT wouldn't be reversed unless you were saying CAT in your original sentence.

I would like to avoid things where decoding becomes ambiguous, such as replacing multiple letters by the same thing, removing all vowels, etc. I did mention this in my original post, as this should be a game about encryption/decryption given rules in order, not trying to reconstruct the sentences without perfect knowledge.

Rule 1: Do a Caesar cipher with a shift equal to the rule number that you are posting. (Ex: Mine would have shifted by 1, so R->S, u->v, etc.)

 

[Pieceofcheese87]

Twng 2: Tgxgtwg vjg qtfgt qh bpavjkpi DWV ngvvgtu qt urcegu. Gz: "Jqy. Fq? Aqw() Fq,,," dgeqohu "Jqy, Fq, Aqw,) Fq(?."

 

[Bobtheblob]

I got reverue for the words after 2. Thats not a word? I probably did it wrong.

 

[Alphaesia]

ReverUe the order of Znything BUT letters or spaces. Ex: "How. Do? You() Do,,," becomFs "How, Do, You,) Do

I bet that this would have been spelt correctly when piece initially wrote it, so it is mostly like that he did the shift wrong, breaking rule 1.
He encoded the S by 3, the A by 1, and the E by 3.

Rule 1: Every word that includes the letter E must be reversed.

 

[Pieceofcheese87]

eluR 2: Your elur must eb nettirw with a cool txet elyts on www.txetlooc.com and dedaolpu as an egami.

 

[Zombie]

Incorrect. After decoding rule 4, you'll note it says to replace the letters with "CAT". When applying the rules in order for the next text, you'll see that you reverse the sentence first, then replace the letters with "CAT" - so each CAT wouldn't be reversed unless you were saying CAT in your original sentence.

I would like to avoid things where decoding becomes ambiguous, such as replacing multiple letters by the same thing, removing all vowels, etc. I did mention this in my original post, as this should be a game about encryption/decryption given rules in order, not trying to reconstruct the sentences without perfect knowledge.

But i reversed "TAC" to "CAT" but then i reversed it back to "TAC" in the sentence to make it backwards.

 

[Pieceofcheese87]

But i reversed "TAC" to "CAT" but then i reversed it back to "TAC" in the sentence to make it backwards.

If you were to do the rules in order, you would have typed your rule
"The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog."
And then reversed it
".god yzal eht revo spmuj xof nworb kciuq ehT"
And then you would replace every "c" "a" and "t" with CAT.
".god yzCATl ehCAT revo spmuj xof nworb kCATiuq ehCAT"

 

[Bobtheblob]

www.txetlooc.com[/URL]

Should that be moc.txetlooc.www?
Sorry for bad quoting. .-.

 

[SleeknFoxy]

Should that be moc.txetlooc.www?
Sorry for bad quoting. .-.

I think it's alright since cooltext is one word, but it's seperated by the dots. I suppose it's a matter of perception.

 

[rickyboy320]

I think it's alright since cooltext is one word, but it's seperated by the dots. I suppose it's a matter of perception.

Where's rule 1 for this..?