Minr Mafia XIX: Retribution

[Srentiln]

As it stands, luma is going to die with 1 vote.

I have told creepa what it is I observed and am waiting to hear from him directly if he is going to allow it. It is not directed at any player, simply an observation that I think we should take into consideration.

 

[swimmy1212]

"Is there a mod-convened chat area for innocents?" /s

Also I think independents win if they are alive and one of the sides wins maybe I could be wrong though.

Also I am as innocent as innocent can be so if y'all wanna inbox me hmu, maybe make a group inbox idk

Also to add, bstrey looking pretty suspicious with the accusations of electro and then voting off a random afk
I will withhold my vote for now

Oh, and should we include @CreepaShadowz in a group chat so that nothing fishy goes on?

Rules say a "mod-sanctioned area" to chat in, otherwise all chat is in this thread I believe.

I agree on holding off on voting people till tomorrow at least, nahfackler may come on to play only to find tons of votes against him with still a day before the lynch.

 

[_Z3_]

I think we should start with lynching the AFK folk first. Then we have more time to think things out and see how a night phase goes. That way, we'll have more to go off of. Might be busy tomorrow, so just in case, #Vote nahfackler .

This came right after my case on Pro Luma and you didn't make any response to it, making me think this could be a redirection off of a partner. I would've thought you would make some type of response to my Pro Luma case and explain why an AFK lynch is better than it.

Also I think independents win if they are alive and one of the sides wins maybe I could be wrong though.

There can probably be multiple ways independents win, it just means they arent sided with innocents or mafia. They might need to live until mafia or town wins, or they might need to kill all other players to win. Or they might need to do some other crazy thing, who knows.

 

[Alphaesia]

"Is there a mod-convened chat area for innocents?" /s

-snip-

Also I am as innocent as innocent can be so if y'all wanna inbox me hmu, maybe make a group inbox idk

-snip-

Oh, and should we include @CreepaShadowz in a group chat so that nothing fishy goes on?

Communicating outside of the thread with other players, regardless if you invite me into the group, is against the rules (with the exception of the Mafia Private Topic).

 

[_Z3_]

Assuming my theory is true about bstrey being ProLuma's player and how she's trying to redirect the lynch off from Luma to nahfackler, that points to nahflackler being an Innocent aligned player that bstrey is trying to mislynch to save her partner.

 

[_Z3_]

Good night everyone, I'm going to bed.
I want Luma lynched the most today, with bstrey as the other one I will compromise on if I need to. I don't want Electro or nahfackler lynched since they're the most likely innocent in my opinion.

 

[Srentiln]

So talked with creeper about it, and we both are on the fence about it. On the one hand, it doesn't really share anything that breaks the rules. On the other, it seems very meta-y in that it is information outside the context of the round. So, I'm holding my tongue until the round is over to see what the general concensus of the players is towards this type of meta-y.

 

[Edan456 the 2nd]

It's 3:50 pm Monday for me at time of posting, and I'll give the afkers until 8am tomorrow to post. If they both post, then based on what others have said, I will vote Luma. But for now, I will wait.

 

[Alphaesia]

THE STATE OF DAY 1
~~~~~
As the Innocents gathered, Electro stood up from the crowd. It was his goal, he knew, to lead the innocents to victory. To some, he talked sense and to others, his quick accusations gave them suspicions of their own. As more and more innocents showed up, the Day gradually began to to make progress. Finally, tensions broke after Z3 voted Pro Luma, followed by bstrey's voting to lynch nah, who hadn't shown up yet. Z3 accused bstrey of defending Luma. The others were a bit more hesitant, waiting for the final 2 innocents to show up.
~~~~~
VOTE COUNT
[1] Pro Luma - _Z3_
[1] nahfackler - bstrey

Pro Luma is up on the chopping block.

24 HOURS REMAIN​

 

[rickyboy320]

I don't get why everyone thinks electro accused bstrey. He clearly said:

-bstrey's question to Creepa is probably more likely to come from an innocent than scum. Otherwise she'd have access to the mafia PT and likely wouldn't have as much incentive to ask that question.

That said, I see a lot of bandwagoning in mindset. Once one started implying electro accused bstrey, a few of people hopped on the 'hmm electro seems suspicious' bandwagon. After that, one additional (vague) reply from bstrey was enough to make her suspicious in the eyes of many?

Anyways to secure the vote count to an AFK for the time being:
#VOTE nahfackler

 

[Gravebound]

Nahfackler specifically stated they might not be very active this game, if at all.
I agree with removing the AFK players from the game initially, if only to remove non-factors from it and gain more information before we proceed with a vote based on facts. #VOTE nahfackler

 

[Zatharel]

That said, I see a lot of bandwagoning in mindset. Once one started implying electro accused bstrey, a few of people hopped on the 'hmm electro seems suspicious' bandwagon. After that, one additional (vague) reply from bstrey was enough to make her suspicious in the eyes of many?

Yeah this makes no sense to me. I can understand wanting to get this day over with, but it seems like some people aren't really reading into what people are saying.

I'm going to stand with my initial statement that the AFK ones are the biggest concern. I don't like having to lynch people based off their inactivity but on the other hand, I'd rather lynch someone who I know will contribute nothing to the game than someone who seems scummy but in fact just made a really bad play.

Of course, if nah comes back and posts something of interest I'll unvote.
#VOTE nahfackler

 

[Edan456 the 2nd]

I don't have any opinion of the active players so far after the day's conversation, so #VOTE nahfackler

 

[Srentiln]

Nah said his access limitations were from the 16 - 23 of next month, so he should be responding. I am holding off on committing to a vote until I feel the quoet ones have had a fair amount of time to say something.

 

[swimmy1212]

Like what Z3 said, it did kind of seem like bstrey waa deflecting the attention off of Pro onto nah, but I agree with waiting awhile first.

#VOTE nahfackler

 

[_Z3_]

If anything it's the AFK players that we should wait to lynch. We should lynch them later when we don't have evidence of people being scum, we HAVE evidence and infornation right now. Is anyone going to say anything about my Pro Luma case or are we just going to lynch someone who hasn't posted anything to judge what side he's on?

 

[_Z3_]

It's 3:50 pm Monday for me at time of posting, and I'll give the afkers until 8am tomorrow to post. If they both post, then based on what others have said, I will vote Luma. But for now, I will wait.

What do you mean by this? Are you saying you are going to use other people's evidence? Are you blindly following others' opinions or do you think the logic people have brought up is legitimately legit?

 

[_Z3_]

Yeah this makes no sense to me. I can understand wanting to get this day over with, but it seems like some people aren't really reading into what people are saying.

I'm going to stand with my initial statement that the AFK ones are the biggest concern. I don't like having to lynch people based off their inactivity but on the other hand, I'd rather lynch someone who I know will contribute nothing to the game than someone who seems scummy but in fact just made a really bad play.

You don't KNOW nahfackler won't contribute anything to the game, he could come back later and do stuff. Plus, it's dumb to lynch an inactive over a person that is scummy just because "the scummy person could be bad town". Yes, they COULD, but it's better than lynching someone who hasnt said anything.

Like what Z3 said, it did kind of seem like bstrey waa deflecting the attention off of Pro onto nah, but I agree with waiting awhile first.

Why do you want to wait to lynch a player with actual evidence that they are scum and instead lynch an AFK player that could come back?

 

[_Z3_]

Nahfackler specifically stated they might not be very active this game, if at all.
I agree with removing the AFK players from the game initially, if only to remove non-factors from it and gain more information before we proceed with a vote based on facts. #VOTE nahfackler

If you want to gain information then a nice way to do that is to lynch someone who has actually said anything.
Also why do you want to wait to lynch someone using facts instead of waiting for the AFK players to come?

 

[swimmy1212]

You can edit your posts Z3 instead of quadruple posting, please do next time

In response to you, I think pro only has that one shred of guilt pointed at him, I'd rather lynch someone who will not be here and hear more facts first.