MM XV - Savern Taren-Odern

[ElectroUnderwear]

Sleek mentioned to me about Creepa but it was my decision to lynch freak. There really shouldn't be any controversy. Freak was an independent. It neither harms nor helps us.

Guest and independent are the same thing FYI. Do my accusations make sense now?

 

[SleeknFoxy]

If freak was a very decently helpful role after creepa's demise, then we know that this lynching is a big blow. However, cory never provided any evidence, even though he did state he was. This means that maybe we should be wary of those who bandwagoned without thought, or that's what it looked like.

#lynch jagman

We need a move on, and just joining the bandwagon so late is of little help and isn't worth it. Voting so late so that trust can be gained is silly. Also, jag has not been active in the thread which means that he may be involved in more activity outside of it.

 

[rmanimal]

Sleek does have a clear point. Since he hasn't been kicked for inactivity after 9 full pages of posts, jag seems like he has undercover work.
#vote jagman77

 

[nahfackler]

Here is my argument, what evidence do you have against Jagman?

 

[SleeknFoxy]

No hard evidence. A big reason I decided it was fine to lynch him was because he was not providing to the thread, and that the bandwagon vote seemed like some way to make it look like he was one of us.

Pretty much what I said in my post. If we don't move along soon we'll get nowhere.

ALSO if anyone would like some info or stay connected and help eachother out PM me.

 

[Srentiln]

As much as I don't want to influence your votes, I feel the need to point out oneo thing:
while I stated that activity this round is important during sign ups, I never said anything about mod-killing for inactivity.

 

[Spontida10]

I don't know how I stand with Cory.

No word on @jagman77 though, but to lynch him? Let's see if he responds first

 

[Pieceofcheese87]

Sorry for being so inactive sren, I never have anything to add to the thread...

 

[nahfackler]

Sleek, why do you want to kill an inactive person, maybe Jagman is just observing in the shadows, I still don't think that killing Jagman will get us anywhere.

 

[jagman77]

Trying to defend myself would not be easy right now, however I have revealed my role to cory, and Im sure that he can back me up when I say getting rid of me could be a big loss to the innocents.

I also know that sleek wasnt cory's only source of information about freak, I also mentioned my suspicions to him.

Not sure if votes for nobody outweighs votes for someone, but
#vote nobody


#AllHandsBraceForImpact

 

[corygolfanatic]

#vote nobody

Inactivity doesn't mean he's a pirate.

 

[ElectroUnderwear]

No hard evidence. A big reason I decided it was fine to lynch him was because he was not providing to the thread, and that the bandwagon vote seemed like some way to make it look like he was one of us.

Pretty much what I said in my post. If we don't move along soon we'll get nowhere.

ALSO if anyone would like some info or stay connected and help eachother out PM me.

I don't think the bandwagon vote really means anything. I would've done the same thing if I had been active while someone was claiming to have hard proof against another player. And the inactivity thing... what has there been to say for most of the round? Jag isn't the only one.

EDIT: And I don't like how Cory made a post but ignored my last question. I was starting to assume he thought "innocent" and "guest" were included in the same faction and I'd misunderstood the lynch against freak, but now I don't know what to think...

 

[coolgolfer]

I agree with the points above, I have been pretty inactive as well but that doesn't mean I'm a pirate. Until someone has evidence or we can work out the cory situation,
#vote nobody

 

[corygolfanatic]

Electro, I honestly do not understand what you're asking me. I'm assessing the current situation and would rather save an innocent than waste my time trying to figure out your question

 

[nahfackler]

I agree with all of the previous votes and I think Jagman is a huge asset, so unless I have solid evidence,

#votenobody

Sleek, I have no idea where you thought that killing inactive people was a good idea

 

[awkward_hamster]

Eh I don't agree with scumkilling, especially considering Jag is usually a valuable asset to the innocents regardless of whether he's a power role or not. There's better people to be voting off right now with the reasoning of 'no contribution'.

#Vote Nobody

 

[creeperTNTman198]

#vote nobody

no hard evidence, no vote. Voting off of guesses has a large likelihood of hurting the crew more then the pirates at this point in the game.

 

[SleeknFoxy]

Well I felt that something had to happen if nothing was happening.

#vote no one

If cory trusts him I can trust him.

 

[ElectroUnderwear]

Electro, I honestly do not understand what you're asking me. I'm assessing the current situation and would rather save an innocent than waste my time trying to figure out your question

It really isn't complicated. You said he wasn't an innocent, which is understandable, but then you extended to saying he wasn't a guest/independent either, giving us no real evidence to support your claim. Then, when he died, you contradicted yourself by saying "but he WAS an independent." Do you get it now?

 

[corygolfanatic]

Ah I see, I thought that a guest was just a powerless innocent, that's where I was mistaken I suppose. I knew he was an independent but I guess my wording was bad.